• home Home
  • keyboard_arrow_right CURRENT AFFAIRS
  • keyboard_arrow_right Posts
  • keyboard_arrow_rightPublic School Sanitation: A pit of contradictions

Public School Sanitation: A pit of contradictions

By Khaya Sithole
Collaboration between the state and the private sector has the wonderful ability to unlock various initiatives that would otherwise take forever to complete. In relation to social and public infrastructure, a country with a strain on its economic resources may end up with no other plan than to partner with the private sector. This is why the recent announcement regarding the Safe Schools initiative involving the government and the public sector is to be welcomed. As part of this initiative, the private sector will partner with the government – particularly the Department of Basic Education – to assist in the eradication of pit toilets in public schools.g

It is naturally the country’s enduring shame that we still have students losing their lives in a pool of human waste simply because the right and adequate infrastructure has not been created in their schools. Whilst Michael Komape’s case is the most prominent one of them all, there are far too many incidences of schoolchildren being exposed to subhuman conditions. These infrastructure problems have long been identified in public schools. Whilst the South African Schools Act introduced the concept of Norms and Standards as far back as 2007, the Minister of Basic Education – quite bizarrely – decided that the Act did not oblige her to publish the Norms and Standards. Rather, she argued that the decision to publish the Norms and Standards was entirely at her discretion. After much haggling between the Minister and Equal Education – which sought to persuade her that not only was the publication of Norms and Standards a necessity for everyone to know what they were entitled to but also that such purported discretion simply made no logic – the Minister still refused until she was pursued in court by Equal Education.
This led to the eventual publication of the Norms and Standards in 2013 which outlined the basic infrastructure requirements for each school. This included a commitment that by 29 November 2016, no school under the custody of the government would be without water, electricity or sanitation. Remarkably, the department then conspired to miss that deadline. So then they were called to account and explain why they had delayed the rollout of basic infrastructure requirements throughout the public education system. In a landmark case in the Bisho High Court, the fact that Norms and Standards are central to the provision of the right to education was specifically highlighted by Equal Education. Naturally, if one is to deliver a Constitutional right to basic education to young children across the country, it is clear that the enabling instruments – including the elements articulated in the Norms and Standards – have to be delivered timeously. Regrettably, the Minister of Basic Education keeps advancing arguments to the effect that her hands are tied as she cannot direct or facilitate other organs of state that are critical to infrastructure rollout, to perform their tasks expeditiously.
In the Bisho judgment, the judge dismissed this contention as it creates an accountability vacuum. Such a vacuum arises since everyone acknowledges that public schools fall under the custody of the Department of Basic Education. For the Department to argue that it is unable to persuade other organs of state to act timeously in facilitating infrastructure rollout creates a paralysis where one school would technically have to approach an unknown number of state organs and coordinate their collective efforts at rolling out infrastructure. This is simply illogical and the Bisho judgment rightly points out that the buck has to stop with the Minister of Basic Education. Given the reality that the schoolchildren affected by this impasse are predominantly black and poor, it is morally objectionable that a government that claims to be pro-poor would take such a stance.
So when the President announced the new initiative this week it would have been important for all those in attendance to ask him to reconcile the 2 positions taken by the government in this matter. Since the crux of the Minister’s appeal on the Bisho judgment is that nothing compels her to accelerate infrastructure delivery, it is unclear how the new partnership will convince her otherwise. And since the Minister has appealed the Bisho judgment the assumption is that she expects the superior courts to rule in her favor – in other words – agree with her that urgency is not paramount to the infrastructure rollout. Should that materialise (heaven forbid), would the new partnership then adopt the same lethargy already prevalent in the Department? With the exception of 3 activists from Equal Education that staged a silent protest, no one asked these questions unfortunately at the swanky Sheraton Hotel.
Whilst collaborations with the private sector are indeed welcome, one also has to remember that the accountability mechanisms differ significantly between the state and private enterprise. Whilst we can all use the Constitution to force the Minister to do the bare minimum, this has regrettably had to be facilitated through the courts with Equal Education, Section27 and Basic Education for All, in particular, championing the cause of poor schoolchildren in the face of state intransigence. The private sector on the other hand – their good intentions notwithstanding – have no Constitutional obligation to ensure the realisation of the right to education as envisaged in section 29. And given the well-known bureaucratic blocks that pervade the civil service, far too many private sector providers have found it easy to walk away.
In this case, the private sector (through the National Education Collaboration Trust) and the Nelson Mandela Foundation have taken the plunge and committed to this partnership. And I strongly believe that they are indeed committed to the accelerated rollout of sanitation infrastructure in public schools. I am just concerned that should Angie Motshekga win her appeal to the Bisho judgment, they will be stranded without a partner.
And an entire generation of black school children will be condemned to the permanent risk of losing their lives, not due to the mere passage of age, but rather thanks to the simple task of trying to get to a toilet everyday…

Written by: Zuko


UpComing Shows

DownLoad Our Mobile App


Privacy Policy


POPIA ActTo promote the protection of personal information processed by public and private bodies; to introduce certain conditions so as to establish minimum requirements for the processing of personal information; to provide for the establishment of an Information Regulator to exercise certain powers and to perform certain duties and functions in terms of this Act and the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000; to provide for the issuing of codes of conduct; to provide for the rights of persons regarding unsolicited electronic communications and automated decision making; to regulate the flow of personal information across the borders of the Republic; and to provide for matters connected therewith.


  • section 14 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, provides that everyone has the right to privacy;
  • the right to privacy includes a right to protection against the unlawful collection, retention, dissemination and use of personal information;
  • the State must respect, protect, promote and fulfil the rights in the Bill of Rights;


  • consonant with the constitutional values of democracy and openness, the need for economic and social progress, within the framework of the information society, requires the removal of unnecessary impediments to the free flow of information, including personal information;


  • regulate, in harmony with international standards, the processing of personal information by public and private bodies in a manner that gives effect to the right to privacy subject to justifiable limitations that are aimed at protecting other rights and important interests,
  1. Definitions and Interpretation

1.1.“Personal Information” means information relating to an identifiable, living, natural person and where it is applicable, identifiable, existing juristic person, including all information as defined in the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013. 

1.2  Parliament assented to POPIA on 19 November 2013. The commencement date of section 1Part A of Chapter 5section 112 and section 113 was 11 April 2014. The commencement date of the other sections was 1 July 2020 (with the exception of section 110 and 114(4). The President of South Africa has proclaimed the POPI commencement date to be 1 July 2020.

1.3. “Processing” means the creation, generation, communication, storage, destruction of personal information as more fully defined in the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013.  

1.4. “You” or the “user” means any person who accesses and browses this website for any purpose. 

1.4. “Website” means the website of the KAYA 959 at URL or such other URL as KAYA 959 may choose from time to time.   

  1. Status and Amendments

2.1. KAYA 959 respects your privacy. This privacy policy statement sets out KAYA 959’s information gathering and dissemination practices in respect of the Website. 

2.2. This Privacy Policy governs the processing of personal information provided to KAYA 959 through your use of the Website. 

2.3. Please note that, due to legal and other developments, KAYA 959 may amend these terms and conditions from time to time.  

  1. Processing of Personal Information

3.1. By providing your personal information to KAYA 959 you acknowledge that it has been collected directly from you and consent to its processing by KAYA 959. 

3.2. Where you submit Personal Information (such as name, address, telephone number and email address) via the website (e.g. through completing any online form) the following principles are observed in the processing of that information: 

3.2.1. KAYA 959 will only collect personal information for a purpose consistent with the purpose for which it is required. The specific purpose for which information is 
collected will be apparent from the context in which it is requested. 

3.2.2. KAYA 959 will only process personal information in a manner that is adequate, relevant and not excessive in the context of the purpose for which it is processed. 

3.2.3. Personal information will only be processed for a purpose compatible with that for which it was collected, unless you have agreed to an alternative purpose in writing or KAYA 959 is permitted in terms of national legislation of general application dealing primarily with the protection of personal information. 

3.2.4. KAYA 959 will keep records of all personal Information collected and the specific purpose for which it was collected for a period of 1 (one) year from the date on which it was last used. 

3.2.5. KAYA 959 will not disclose any personal information relating to you to any third party unless your prior written agreement is obtained or KAYA 959 is required to do so by law. 

3.2.6. If personal information is released with your consent KAYA 959 will retain a record of the information released, the third party to which it was released, the reason for the release and the date of release, for a period of 1 (one) year from the date on which it was last used. 

3.2.7. KAYA 959 will destroy or delete any personal information that is no longer needed by KAYA 959 for the purpose it was initially collected, or subsequently processed. 

3.3. Note that, as permitted by the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002, KAYA 959 may use personal information collected to compile profiles for statistical purposes. No information contained in the profiles or statistics will be able to be linked to any specific user.    

  1. Collection of anonymous data

4.1. KAYA 959 may use standard technology to collect information about the use of this website. This technology is not able to identify individual users but simply allows KAYA 959 to collect statistics. 

4.2. KAYA 959 may utilise temporary or session cookies to keep track of users’ browsing habits. A cookie is a small file that is placed on your hard drive in order to keep a record of your interaction with this website and facilitate user convenience. 

4.2.1. Cookies by themselves will not be used to identify users personally but may be used to compile identified statistics relating to use of services offered or to provide KAYA 959 with feedback on the performance of this website. 

4.2.2. The following classes of information may be collected in respect of users who have enabled cookies: The browser software used; IP address; Date and time of activities while visiting the website; URLs of internal pages visited; and referrers. 

4.3. If you do not wish cookies to be employed to customize your interaction with this website it is possible to alter the manner in which your browser handles cookies. Please note that, if this is done, certain services on this website may not be available. 

  1. Security

5.1. KAYA 959 takes reasonable measures to ensure the security and integrity of information submitted to or collected by this website, but cannot under any circumstances be held liable for any loss or other damage sustained by you as a result of unlawful access to or dissemination of any personal information by a third party. 

  1. Links to other websites

6.1. KAYA 959 has no control over and accepts no responsibility for the privacy practices of any third party websites to which hyperlinks may have been provided and KAYA 959 strongly recommends that you review the privacy policy of any website you visit before using it further. 

  1. Queries

7.1. If you have any queries about this privacy policy please contact us by emailing [email protected]